WHY THE UCC FILING?
Short
Explanation as is Understood at this Time
(Subject to further
clarification)
Around the time of the war between the United States and the
southern states of the American union, the United States was busy putting
together a plan that would increase the jurisdiction of the United States. This
plan was necessary because the United States had no subjects and only the land
ceded to it from the states, ie. the District which was only ten miles square
and such land as was necessary for forts, magazines, arsenals, etc.
Between the 1860's and the early 1900's, banking and taxing mechanisms
were changing through legislation. Cunning people closely associated with the
powers in England had great influence on the legislation being passed in the
United States. Of course such legislation did not apply to the states or to the
people in the states, but making the distinction was not deemed to be a
necessary duty of the legislators. It was the responsibility of the people to
understand their relationship to the United States and to the laws that were
being passed by the legislature. This distinction between the United States and
the states was taught in the homes and the schools and churches. The early
admiralty courts did not interpret legislation as broadly at that time because
the people knew when the courts were overstepping their jurisdiction. The
people were in control because they knew who they were and where they
were standing in relation to the United States.
In 1913 the United
States added numerous private laws to its books that facilitated the increase of
subjects and property for the United States. The 14th Amendment provided for a
new class of citizens - United States citizens, that had not formerly been
recognized. Until the 14th Amendment in 1868, there were no persons born or
naturalized in the United States. They had all been born or naturalized in one
of the several states. United States citizenship was a result of state
citizenship. After the Civil War, a new class was recognized, and was the
beginning of the democracy sited in the District of Columbia. The American
people in the republic sited in the several states, could choose to benefit as
one of these new United States citizens BY CHOICE. The new class of citizens was
given the right to vote in the democracy in 1870 by the 15th Amendment. All it
required was an application. Benefits came with this new citizenship, but with
the benefits, came duties and responsibilities that were totally regulated by
the legislature for the District of Columbia. Edward Mandell House is attributed
with giving a very detailed outline of the plans to be implemented to enslave
the American people. (1) The 13th Amendment in 1865 opened the way for the
people to volunteer into slavery to accept the benefits offered by the United
States. Whether House actually spoke the words or not , is really irrelevant
because the scenario detailed in the statement attributed to him has clearly
been implemented. Central banking for the United States was legislated with the
Federal Reserve Act in 1913. The ability to decrease the currency in circulation
through taxation was legislated with the 16th Amendment in 1913. Support for the
presumption that the American people had volunteered to participate in the
United States democracy was legislated with the 17th Amendment in 1913. The path
was provided for the control of the courts, with the creation of the American
Bar Association in 1913.
In 1917 the United States legislature passed
the Trading with the Enemy Act and the Emergency War Powers Act, opening the
doors for the United States to suspend limitations otherwise mandated in the
Constitution. Even in times of peace, every contrived and created social,
political, or financial emergency was sufficient authority for the officers of
the United States to overstep its peace time powers and implement volumes of
“law” that would increase the coffers of the United States. There is always a
declared emergency in the United States and its States, but it only applies to
their subjects.
In the 1920's the States accelerated the push for
mothers to register their babies. Life was good and people were not paying
attention to what was happening in government. The stock market crashed, and
those who were not on the inside were not warned to take their money out before
they lost everything.
In the 1930's federal legislation provided for
registration of babies through applications for birth certificates, so
government workers could get maternity leave with pay. The States pushed for
registration of cars through applications for certificates of title, and for
registration of land through registration of deeds of trust. Constructive trusts
secretly were created as each of the people blindly walked into the United
States democracy, thereby agreeing to be sureties for the debts of the United
States. The great depression supplied the diversion to keep the people's
attention off what government was doing. The Social Security program was
implemented, along with numerous other United States programs that invited the
American people to volunteer to be the sureties behind the United States' new
registered property and adhesion contracts through the new United States
subjects.
The plan was well on its path by 1933. Massive registration of
property through United States agencies, including the State of _______
subdivisions, was assuring the United States and its officers would get rich
beyond their wildest expectations, as predicted by Mendall House. All of this
was done without disclosure of the material facts that accompanied each
application for registration - fraud. The fraud was a sufficient reason to
charge all the United States officers with treason, UNLESS a remedy could be
supplied for the people to recoup their property and collect for the damages
they suffered as a result of the fraud.
If a remedy were available, and
the people chose not to or failed to use their remedy, no charge of fraud could
be sustained even in a common law court. The United States only needed to
provide the remedy. It was not required to explain it or even tell the people
where the remedy could be found. The attorneys did not even have to be taught
about the remedy. That gave them plausible deniability when the people struggled
to understand the new laws. The legislators did not have to have the intricate
details of the law explained to them regarding the bills they were passing. That
gave them plausible deniability. If the people failed to use their remedy, the
United States came out the winner every time. If the people did discover their
remedy, the United States had to honor it and release the registered property
back to the people, but only if the people knew they had a remedy, and only if
they requested it in the proper manner. It was a great plan.
With
plausible deniability, even when the people knew they had a remedy and pursued
it, the attorneys, judges, and legislators could act like they did not
understand the people's claims. Requiring the public schools to teach civics,
government, and history classes out of approved politically correct text books
also assured the people would not find the remedy for a long time. Passing new
State and Federal laws that appeared to subject the people to rules and
regulations, added another level of protection against the people finding their
remedy. The public media was molded to report politically correct, though
substantially incorrect, news day after day, until few people would even think
there could be a remedy available to them. The people could be separated from
their money and their time to pursue the remedy long enough for the solutions to
be lost in the pages of millions of books in huge law libraries across the
country. So many people know there is something wrong with all the conflicts in
the laws with the “facts” taught in the schools. How can the American people be
free and subject to a sovereign governments whims at the same time? Who would
ever have thought the people would be resourceful enough to actually find the
remedy? BUT they did!
In 1933 the United States put its insurance policy
into place with House Joint Resolution 192 (2) and recorded it in the
Congressional Record. It was not required to be promulgated in the Federal
Register. An Executive Order issued on April 5, 1933 paving the way for the
withdrawal of gold in the United States. Representative Louis T. McFadden
brought formal charges on May 23, 1933 against the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve Bank system, the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Secretary
of the United States Treasury (Congressional Record May 23, 1933 page
4055-4058). HJR 192 passed on June 3, 1933. Mr. MaFadden claimed on June 10,
1933: “Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt
institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and
the Federal Reserve Banks...” HJR 192 is the insurance policy that protects the
legislators from conviction for fraud and treason against the American people.
It also protects the American people from damages caused by the actions of the
United States.
HJR 192 provided that the one with the gold paid the
bills. It removed the requirement that the United States subjects and employees
had to pay their debts with gold. It actually prohibited the inclusion of a
clause in all subsequent contracts that would require payment in gold. It also
cancelled the clause in every contract written prior to June 5, 1933, that
required an obligation to be paid in gold - retroactively. It provided that the
United States subjects and employees could use any type of coin and currency to
discharge a public debt as long as it was in use in the normal course of
business in the United States. For a time, United States Notes were the currency
used to discharge debts, but later the Federal Reserve and the United States
provided a new medium of exchange through paper notes, and debt instruments that
could be passed on to a debtor's creditors to discharge the debtor's debts. That
same currency is available to us to use to discharge public debts.
In the
1950's the Uniform Commercial Code was presented to the States as a means of
unifying the generally accepted procedures for handling the new legal system of
dealing with commercial fictions as though they were real. Security instruments
replaced substance as collateral for debts. Security instruments could be
supported by presumptive contracts. Debt instruments with collateral, and
accommodating parties, could be used instead of money. Money and the need for
money was disappearing, and a uniform system of laws had to be put in place to
allow the courts to uphold the security instruments that depended on commercial
fictions as a basis for compelling payment or performance. All this was
accomplished by the mid 1960's.
The commercial code is merely a
codification of accepted and required procedures all people engaged in
commercial activities must follow. The basic principles of commerce had been
settled thousands of years ago, but were refined as commerce become more
sophisticated over the years. In the 1900's the age-old principles of commerce
shifted from substance to form. Presumption became a big part of the law.
Without giving a degree of force to presumption, the new direction in enforcing
commercial claims could not be supported in courts. If the claimants were
required to produce their claims every time they tried to collect money or time
from the people, they would seldom be successful. The principles expressed in
the code combine the means of dealing with substantive commercial activities
with the means of dealing with presumptive commercial activities. These
principles work as well for the people as they do for the deceivers. The rules
do not respect persons.
Those who enticed the people to register their
things with the United States and its sub-divisions, gained control of the
substance through the registrations. The United States became the Holder of the
titles to many things. The definition of “property” is the interest one has in a
thing. The thing is the principal. The property is the interest in the thing.
Profits (interest) made from the property of another, belong to the owner of the
thing. Profits were made by the deceivers by pledging the registered property in
commercial markets, but the profits do not belong to the deceivers. The profits
belong to the owners of the things. That is always the people. The corporation
only shows ownership of paper - titles to things. The substance cannot appear in
the fiction. [[Watch the movie Last Action Hero and watch the confusion created
when they try to mix substance and fiction.]] Sometimes the fiction is made to
look very much like substance, but fiction can never become substance. It is an
impossibility.
The profits from all the registered things had to be put
into trust (constructive) for the benefit of the owners. If the profits were put
into the general fund of the United States and not into separate trusts for the
owners, the scheme would represent fraud. The profits for each owner could not
be commingled. If the owner failed to use his available remedy (fictional
credits held in a constructive trust account, fund, or financial ledger) to
benefit from the profits, it would not be the fault of the deceivers. If the
owner failed to learn the law that would open the door to his remedy, it would
not be the fault of the deceivers. The owner is responsible for learning the
law, so he understands that the profits from his things are available for him to
discharge debts or charges brought against his public person by the United
States.
If the United States has the “gold”, the United States pays the
bills (from the trust account, fund, or financial ledger). The definition of
“fund” is money set aside to pay a debt. The fund is there to discharge the
public debts attributed to the United States subjects, but ultimately back to
the accommodating parties - the American people. The national debt that is owed
is to the owners of the registered things - the American people, as well as to
other creditors.
If the United States owes a debt to the owner of the
thing, and the owner is presumed (by accommodation) to owe a public debt to the
United States, the logical thing is to ask the United States to discharge that
public debt from the trust fund. The way for the United States to get around
having to pay the public debts for the people is to claim the owner cannot be an
owner if he agreed to be the accommodating party for a debtor person. If the
people are truly the principle, then they know how to handle their financial and
political affairs, ULNESS they have never been taught. If the owner admits by
his actions out of ignorance, that he is an accommodating party, he has taken on
the debtor's liabilities without getting consideration in exchange. Here lies
the fiction again. The owner of the thing does not have to knowingly agree to be
the accommodating party for the debtor person; he just has to act like he
agreed. That is easy if he has a choice of going to jail or signing for the
debtor person. The presumption that he is the accommodating party is strong
enough for the courts to hold the owner of the thing liable for a tax on the
thing he actually owns.
Debtors may have the use of certain things, but
the things belong to the creditors. The creditor is the master. The debtor is
the servant. The Uniform Commercial Code is very specific about the duties and
responsibilities a debtor has. If the owner of the thing is presumed to be a
debtor because of his previous admissions and adhesion contracts, he is going to
have a difficult time convincing the United States that it has a duty to
discharge public debts for him. In addition, the courts are staffed with loyal
judges who will look for every mistake the people make when trying to use their
remedy.
There is a very powerful tool the people can use to help them
get to the real issues when they find themselves up against the power of
presumption. The law provides for either party of an admiralty court action to
OBJECT to a line of questioning. When you object in that court setting, you must
tell the judge why you object, or he will overrule your objection. The reason
is:
“This line of questioning assumes facts not in evidence.”
You can request that evidence of the Plaintiff's claim be entered as
evidence. If the judge overrules this fundamental, basic, underlying, necessary
principle of establishing jurisdiction and right to make a charge, there is a
major procedural error in the proceeding. Granting impersonam jurisdiction to
get to the bottom of the issue is vastly better than arguing, “I'm not that
person.”
The owner of the thing, after learning the law and discovering
who he is in relation to the United States, can file a UCC Financing Statement
and Security Agreement registering his interest in the artificial entity (PERSON) the United
States created after Mom applied for a birth certificate. That was the act of
registering her biological property, her baby (substance), with the State of
_______. The United States holds the paper title (form), not the substance
(baby). Until your Financing Statement is filed, the United States is the holder
of the title to the artificial entity. Its name is spelled in all capital letter
- JOHN HENRY DOE. When John Henry Doe files the Financing Statement supported by
a Security Agreement signed by the artificial entity (JOHN) and the owner
(John), he becomes the holder in due course of the title to JOHN. The UCC and
the State commercial law are very specific about the effect of a registered
security interest. It has priority over most other interest claimed (only
claimed) in the same thing. The evidence that is missing in the court, is the
registered claim over the person (JOHN).
The owner also must notify the
Secretary of the Treasury that he is going to handle his own affairs in the
future. He can file a Bill of Exchange with the Secretary through which he
exchanges his person's accepted-for-value birth certificate and social security
numbers, for a chargeback of all the presumed charges brought against his person
since the birth certificate was issued.
The owner can also reserve a
noncash Federal Reserve routing number and any number of noncash instrument
numbers by filing an amendment to his Financing Statement or just including his
reservation on his original Financing Statement. Each bank account opened in the
name of the owner's person has a routing number. If an account is open, it is
available to process cash items. If you write a check to the plumber, it can be
converted to cash at your bank. You cannot write a check on an account that has
been closed. Those accounts and their routing numbers are reserved for noncash
items for the person (JOHN) that opened the account originally. Accounts that
have been closed by the bank instead of the person, should not be used for
noncash items. Once this is done, you are in a position to begin receiving
reimbursements against the obligation the United States owes to you for money
and time it has received that belong to you.
The owner of registered
things, who has learned the law and what his rights are, and has filed his
Financing Statement, Security Agreement, and Bill of Exchange, and reserved his
noncash account routing numbers, can issue an instrument indicating his UCC
registration number, his registered Federal Reserve routing number, the name of
the public party making a charge against his person, and the amount of the debt
to be discharge.
Think of the whole transaction in relation to a dead
battery. The batter represents your public person (JOHN), which is a dead entity
that can function within the public maize of fiction, transmitting benefits from
the public to you in the private IF it is charged up. You cannot go into the
public because you are not a fiction. JOHN has no power until it is charged with
some energy. That energy comes from an IRS default notice, court judgment,
credit card bill, utility bill, traffic ticket, or some other instrument that
has a $ amount and JOHN's name on it as the presumed debtor. The bill is the
energy. It charges the dead JOHN. You can now discharge JOHN and put JOHN's
accrual account with the charging party back to a zero balance. You as the
secured party over the assets put up as security by JOHN to you as collateral
for the debt JOHN owes you, can discharge JOHN with a negotiable instrument for
the same $ amount as the charging instrument. The charging party that receives
your noncash item can 1) process it through a United States department, 2) give
it to a third party, 3) keep it to increase its liquidity.
When you, as
the owner of a thing, registered it with the United States or one of its
subdivisions, you let the United States hold the legal title to your thing based
on misrepresentation and failure to disclose material facts to you at the time
of registration. You probably retained possession of the thing. The United
States invested the title and made a profit. If you did not specifically
authorize the United States and its agents to invest the legal title, the
profits made from that title belong to you, because as the owner, you remain the
equitable title holder. Legally all the profits from the investment of the
titles to all your registered things must go into a fund for your benefit. If
they did not put the profits in a trust fund of some sort, it would be fraud.
Just acquiring the titles through what is promoted as mandatory
registration, is fraud. If the scenario attributed to Mandell House is now in
full application in the United States, which it is, the officers of the United
States could be charged and convicted with treason IF they had not provided a
remedy, which they did. -- House Joint Resolution 192 on June 5, 1933. This is
their insurance policy to assure they are not convicted of treason. That does
not mean they cannot be charged with treason, but the courts will dismiss based
on failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Because you have a
remedy outside the court, you cannot sustain a charge of treason.
The
problem in the past with trying to discharge public debts with instruments that
could not be processed through your bank on the corner, was that those discharge
instruments did not route through the Federal Reserve. It is the bean counter
for the national debt. That debt is first and primarily owed to the people who
are the equitable titleholders of all the substance in this country. If you try
to discharge a public debt with your discharge instrument, and you do not route
it through the Federal Reserve, it appears you are receiving a benefit from the
United States without exchanging it for something of value. This is not
technically correct because you have a right to be reimbursed, whether or not
you apply it toward the debt the United States owes you. You are the substance;
it is the fiction.
If you do route your discharge instrument through the
Federal Reserve, where the national debt owed to you can be reduced by the
amount of the instrument, you have made an exchange that fits nicely into their
accrual bookkeeping system. Your PERSON's charge from the
charging party within the United States commercial scheme is discharged, and the
debt the United States owes to you is discharged by the same amount. That is a
quid pro quo, and everyone is happy, EXCEPT those who are not interested in the
money but just want to be in control from behind the scenes.
To
accomplish this quid pro quo exchange:
1. your claim to being one of the
people must appear on a public register (the Secretary of State),
2. you
must have an account with the banker for the United States (the Secretary of the
Treasury),
3. you must have given notice of your reservation of routing
numbers through the national debt accountant (the Federal Reserve),
4.
you must refer to the insurance policy that covers your remedy (House Joint Resolution
192),
5. you must make your instrument negotiable so it can be used
by the United States for a profit,
6. you must transmit your instrument
back into the public through an agent (your registered debtor),
7. you
must only use a noncash item for this exchange,
8. you must do a banker's
acceptance of a charging instrument to attach to your noncash item,
and
9. you must understand that you are not getting something for nothing
Reserving your routing numbers to use on your discharge instruments is
not as difficult as was thought during the previous decade. Every person has
opened bank accounts in the past that have been closed for one reason for
another. On the bottom of the checks for those closed bank accounts is a routing
number to the particular bank and a routing number to the particular account.
Each check has a check number. When you put the check number together with the
two routing numbers, you have a means of tracking each item that goes through
the worldwide banking system. The routing numbers on the bottom of the checks
from accounts your person has closed will never be reassigned. They are attached
to your person's NAME forever and kept in the records of the Federal Reserve.
Bank accounts that are still open and active are used for cash items.
Checks written on these open bank accounts can be taken to the particular bank
and CASHED. This is the type of instrument used in commercial transactions
everyday. There is a fund attached to the check from which the debt evidenced by
the check can be paid.
Bank accounts that are no longer open and active
cannot be used to process cash items. They can only be used to process noncash
items. They require special handling. Title 12 of USC and CFR explain how and
when receiving banks are to process noncash items. A closed bank account
associated with your debtor's NAME, has routing numbers that can route your
discharge instrument through the Federal Reserve to reduce the national debt to
you and increase the balance of the bank account of the party that is charging
your debtor. It is a WIN WIN situation.
The charging party is instructed
to mail the discharge instrument to the Secretary of Transportation. Title 46
has sufficient evidence to support the proposition that the Secretary is the
trustee over some or all vessels mortgaged by the United States. If your debtor
PERSON is presumed to be a vessel, it is regulated by the Secretary of
Transportation through the Maritime Ministries Administration, that is the
proper party to assist in processing your noncash item. The Secretary of
Transportation can forward the item to the Secretary of the Treasury, who
already has been notified to prepare for noncash activity in your treasury
direct account on the Bill of Exchange. The Secretary of the Treasury is
directly related to the Federal Reserve. Between the Treasury and the Federal
Reserve, your noncash item can be directed to the proper parties to settle the
account and get everyone into that quid pro quo position we want.
The
United States and its co-business partners are debtors to you. You are the
creditor, not only over your debtor PERSON, but also over the United States, the
legal titleholder over the registered things to which you are the equitable
titleholder. You are the primary creditor, so if the United States has other
creditors, like the international bankers, they cannot jump to the front of the
line. Their claims are subordinated to your claims if your claims are registered
and if you understand the law surrounding what you are doing.
LEARN THE
LAW FIRST, THEN JUMP OFF THE CLIFF!!!!!!!!!